Luca Telese from the FQ 01/08/2001
"The real movie is not what the Fiat we are seeing. Is there a trick macroscopic, we must sharpen intelligence to understand it. " Maurizio Zipponi, deus ex machina IDV on Labour, is the man who has fought most of all because his party take a stand against the Fiat. Now, with his usual calm voice, explains the plot twist that drives his analysis: "The chorus of apologists Marchionne, the logic of confrontation, the hidden truth about this deal."
Mr Zipponi, what is it about?
Simple: everything suggests that it is not Fiat to buy Chrysler, as we tell the media, but to buy Chrysler Fiat. If you do not understand this you do not understand anything.
is suggestive, but difficult to prove ...
you say? We try to put in a different order of the specific facts already on the table and read them differently.
where to start?
Who really makes money, for example.
Who? The government
Obama. Marchionne setting as a constraint to protect the production in America. Nothing wrong: it's what everyone else in the world, from Sarkozy, with the exception of Berlusconi.
The Italian government says the layoffs through the INPS.
It is not grotesque? In the other countries give money to produce, in our pay to not produce. With high costs. But not
quits.
Mirafori A stationary, in turn, for a year. I fear that they will work during the week of voting, and then threaten to end in layoffs forever.
tell me the other elements.
Instead of talking about models that are not there, or maybe you will not ever talk instead of new ones that will do for sure, and see where it will.
Let me call the roll.
I have business plans official: the new Multipla is made in Serbia, where there is state aid. The new Ulysses and the 500 will make electricity in America, as the new Lancia Thema and derived from the Chrysler. The Fiat Doblo that will give the Opel will be in Turkey, the new city car will be in Brazil ... Where are the Italian cars?
There is the new Ypsilon.
was announced a year ago, and had already slipped by one year. It will be this year?
Nothing in Italy, does that mean?
Great products for now no, the list is not updated.
I play devil's advocate: Marchionne has bought the first share of Chrysler without spending a single euro.
's the point! Instead, it tries to reverse: the Chrysler, which was, and is technically bankrupt, and without know-how, has been free from Fiat, the patents to produce new machines at once, without spending a single euro. It is sure that we gain the Fiat?
But then who would gain, according to you?
Marchionne with stock options, of course. Above all, the Agnelli family which is free cash and diluting its share of self control, as he had suggested at the time of negotiations with GM.
Why do you defend DiPietro Fiom?
Because I think it was chosen as a perfect scapegoat.
Why?
Because if the goal was to produce, had already agreed to make cars and increasing the hours of work on 18!
Yet?
Today Fiat is the true priorities of the financial side, not productivity.
That scenario imagines?
What if he wins the line at Mirafiori Marchionne, is one of more opportunities the car to go away from Turin, Italy after a hundred years!
It would all agree?
I know that in Banca Intesa, there is concern with respect to a senior who wants money from banks to buy and relocate production outside.
Why should oppose the center?
Why we need to explain to workers that the anti-League Fiat has become the crutch of this unusual task: to use the money to finance the northern Italian know-how to put the American car service. He
amazed at the choice of the Democratic Party?
I was sorry, that's different. Unfortunately some things from far away ...
mean?
I can tell an illuminating anecdote: In 1988 I came to the CGIL in a tough negotiation for Iveco. The manager Fiat occasionally opened a door, and went into a room.
That's what did it mean?
We found that in that room was Piero Fassino, who gave parallel things that we were battling.
How did it end?
A screaming. I am a peaceful but it was a miracle is not fighting. Even
nell'Idv you split, Donadio and pro-Fiat.
I judge politicians by the decisive choices. In Italy there are two alternatives prohibited: ecclestiastiche go against the hierarchy and go against the Fiat.
Why do you say?
Di Pietro has demonstrated his courage by taking an unpopular position. But if you can - saw this scenario - far-sighted.
Mr Zipponi, what is it about?
Simple: everything suggests that it is not Fiat to buy Chrysler, as we tell the media, but to buy Chrysler Fiat. If you do not understand this you do not understand anything.
is suggestive, but difficult to prove ...
you say? We try to put in a different order of the specific facts already on the table and read them differently.
where to start?
Who really makes money, for example.
Who? The government
Obama. Marchionne setting as a constraint to protect the production in America. Nothing wrong: it's what everyone else in the world, from Sarkozy, with the exception of Berlusconi.
The Italian government says the layoffs through the INPS.
It is not grotesque? In the other countries give money to produce, in our pay to not produce. With high costs. But not
quits.
Mirafori A stationary, in turn, for a year. I fear that they will work during the week of voting, and then threaten to end in layoffs forever.
tell me the other elements.
Instead of talking about models that are not there, or maybe you will not ever talk instead of new ones that will do for sure, and see where it will.
Let me call the roll.
I have business plans official: the new Multipla is made in Serbia, where there is state aid. The new Ulysses and the 500 will make electricity in America, as the new Lancia Thema and derived from the Chrysler. The Fiat Doblo that will give the Opel will be in Turkey, the new city car will be in Brazil ... Where are the Italian cars?
There is the new Ypsilon.
was announced a year ago, and had already slipped by one year. It will be this year?
Nothing in Italy, does that mean?
Great products for now no, the list is not updated.
I play devil's advocate: Marchionne has bought the first share of Chrysler without spending a single euro.
's the point! Instead, it tries to reverse: the Chrysler, which was, and is technically bankrupt, and without know-how, has been free from Fiat, the patents to produce new machines at once, without spending a single euro. It is sure that we gain the Fiat?
But then who would gain, according to you?
Marchionne with stock options, of course. Above all, the Agnelli family which is free cash and diluting its share of self control, as he had suggested at the time of negotiations with GM.
Why do you defend DiPietro Fiom?
Because I think it was chosen as a perfect scapegoat.
Why?
Because if the goal was to produce, had already agreed to make cars and increasing the hours of work on 18!
Yet?
Today Fiat is the true priorities of the financial side, not productivity.
That scenario imagines?
What if he wins the line at Mirafiori Marchionne, is one of more opportunities the car to go away from Turin, Italy after a hundred years!
It would all agree?
I know that in Banca Intesa, there is concern with respect to a senior who wants money from banks to buy and relocate production outside.
Why should oppose the center?
Why we need to explain to workers that the anti-League Fiat has become the crutch of this unusual task: to use the money to finance the northern Italian know-how to put the American car service. He
amazed at the choice of the Democratic Party?
I was sorry, that's different. Unfortunately some things from far away ...
mean?
I can tell an illuminating anecdote: In 1988 I came to the CGIL in a tough negotiation for Iveco. The manager Fiat occasionally opened a door, and went into a room.
That's what did it mean?
We found that in that room was Piero Fassino, who gave parallel things that we were battling.
How did it end?
A screaming. I am a peaceful but it was a miracle is not fighting. Even
nell'Idv you split, Donadio and pro-Fiat.
I judge politicians by the decisive choices. In Italy there are two alternatives prohibited: ecclestiastiche go against the hierarchy and go against the Fiat.
Why do you say?
Di Pietro has demonstrated his courage by taking an unpopular position. But if you can - saw this scenario - far-sighted.
0 comments:
Post a Comment